Timeline for Question on geometric measure theory
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2011 at 23:06 | comment | added | Gerald Edgar | I also note that Howroyd attributes the real & Euclidean cases to Besicovitch and Davies, not to Marstrand. | |
| Nov 15, 2011 at 23:00 | comment | added | Gerald Edgar | Howroyd's first two pages can be viewed here: mendeley.com/research/… (see the statement of Corollary 7). | |
| Nov 15, 2011 at 18:09 | vote | accept | Ema | ||
| Nov 15, 2011 at 18:09 | |||||
| Nov 15, 2011 at 18:03 | comment | added | Ema | Thank you very much. I do not know where you use the finitness assumption of \alpha in your argument. The finiteness seems to be needed only for \beta. If it is possible, would you please tell me which statement you used in Howroyd's paper? | |
| Nov 15, 2011 at 15:56 | history | edited | Gerald Edgar | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 268 characters in body; added 88 characters in body; deleted 46 characters in body
|
| Nov 15, 2011 at 15:38 | history | answered | Gerald Edgar | CC BY-SA 3.0 |