Timeline for Magic square of fibered products: vague/unclear?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Jun 7, 2023 at 16:50 | history | suggested | Elías Guisado Villalgordo | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Improved the formatting of the commutative diagram
|
| Jun 7, 2023 at 13:55 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jun 7, 2023 at 16:50 | |||||
| Nov 19, 2011 at 23:50 | vote | accept | topspin1617 | ||
| Nov 13, 2011 at 12:18 | answer | added | Buschi Sergio | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 13, 2011 at 12:13 | answer | added | Martin Brandenburg | timeline score: 32 | |
| Nov 13, 2011 at 7:35 | comment | added | Will Sawin | These sorts of category theory arguments require you to appeal to universal properties a lot. If you like appealing to universal properties (as I do), it's really awesome. In general does appear to be something deeply significant about universal properties, in that if you can appeal to a universal property, it's generally a good idea and you'll probably get something useful out of it. | |
| Nov 13, 2011 at 4:32 | comment | added | user4192 | I think you've got it. Note that since we have no idea what category we're in, a priori there aren't any other choices than the ones you made. | |
| Nov 13, 2011 at 3:47 | history | asked | topspin1617 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |