Timeline for Why should the anabelian geometry conjectures be true?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2012 at 2:22 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Feb 4, 2012 at 2:22 | history | bounty ended | Makhalan Duff | ||
| Feb 4, 2012 at 1:57 | answer | added | James D. Taylor | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 28, 2012 at 18:01 | history | edited | Makhalan Duff |
edited tags
|
|
| Jan 28, 2012 at 1:52 | history | bounty started | Makhalan Duff | ||
| Nov 12, 2011 at 11:49 | answer | added | Robert Kucharczyk | timeline score: 15 | |
| Nov 12, 2011 at 11:03 | comment | added | Lars | I remember reading somewhere (perhaps in Faltings' Bourbaki report on Mochizuki's Theorem?) that Mostow's Rigidity theorem (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mostow_rigidity_theorem) was one of the motivations. | |
| Nov 12, 2011 at 5:26 | history | edited | Makhalan Duff | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Nov 12, 2011 at 5:18 | comment | added | Torsten Ekedahl | I agree that that seems a tenuous argument. Any convincing argument has to be able to make a distinction between the genus $1$ and higher genus cases. | |
| Nov 11, 2011 at 22:56 | history | asked | Makhalan Duff | CC BY-SA 3.0 |