Timeline for Why a subvariety of a variety of general type is of general type
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2010 at 11:54 | history | undeleted | VA. | ||
| Apr 23, 2010 at 4:01 | history | deleted | VA. | ||
| Dec 7, 2009 at 2:17 | comment | added | Fei YE | Thanks. The explain makes sense. I surely need to read the paper you suggested. | |
| Dec 7, 2009 at 1:54 | vote | accept | Fei YE | ||
| Dec 7, 2009 at 1:54 | |||||
| Dec 7, 2009 at 1:51 | vote | accept | Fei YE | ||
| Dec 7, 2009 at 1:53 | |||||
| Dec 7, 2009 at 1:26 | history | edited | VA. | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 746 characters in body; added 273 characters in body
|
| Dec 7, 2009 at 0:57 | comment | added | Fei YE | Thank you! I know nothing about Lang's conjecture. The question I asked is an exercise in GIANLUCA PACIENZA's survey paper PLURICANONICAL SYSTEMS ON PROJECTIVE VARIETIES OF GENERAL TYPE. Exercise 3.1. Let X be a variety of general type. Prove that a subvariety of X passing through a general point is also of general type. I think when he talks about general point, he does mean that a point in some Zariski open set. | |
| Dec 7, 2009 at 0:00 | history | answered | VA. | CC BY-SA 2.5 |