Skip to main content
16 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 21, 2019 at 4:31 history edited Martin Sleziak CC BY-SA 4.0
updated the dead link (the question has been bumped anyway by a new answer)
Mar 20, 2019 at 5:46 answer added Ning JIANG timeline score: 5
Dec 7, 2009 at 2:10 vote accept Fei YE
Dec 7, 2009 at 1:54 vote accept Fei YE
Dec 7, 2009 at 1:54
Dec 7, 2009 at 1:54 vote accept Fei YE
Dec 7, 2009 at 1:54
Dec 7, 2009 at 1:53 vote accept Fei YE
Dec 7, 2009 at 1:53
Dec 7, 2009 at 1:51 vote accept Fei YE
Dec 7, 2009 at 1:53
Dec 7, 2009 at 1:51 vote accept Fei YE
Dec 7, 2009 at 1:51
Dec 7, 2009 at 1:35 comment added Fei YE A correction, $\Omega_D$ and $\Omega_X$ should be read as $\omega_D$ and $\omega_X$.
Dec 7, 2009 at 0:58 answer added Jorge Vitório Pereira timeline score: 4
Dec 7, 2009 at 0:52 comment added Fei YE As we know, for a codimension 1 subvariety $D$ in $X$, the canonical line bundle $\Omega_D$ on $D$ isomorphic to the restriction of $(\Omega_X\otimes\mathcal{O}_X(D))|_D$. This is called the adjunction formula. But for higher codimension subvarieties, this formula is no longer true. As I know, Kawamata has papers to deal with the higher codimension case. Can someone explain Kawamata's results?
Dec 7, 2009 at 0:00 answer added VA. timeline score: 12
Dec 6, 2009 at 23:54 comment added JSE I think he means that if X is general type, there is a proper closed subvariety Z of X with the property that EVERY closed subvariety of X not of general type is a subscheme of Z.
Dec 6, 2009 at 22:00 comment added Leonid Positselski I am no algebraic geometer, but still what on Earth are subvarieties of codimension no less than 2 containing a general point?
Dec 6, 2009 at 21:17 history edited Fei YE CC BY-SA 2.5
added 45 characters in body; added 11 characters in body
Dec 6, 2009 at 21:09 history asked Fei YE CC BY-SA 2.5