Timeline for Why are people interested in Cohen-Macaulay of codimension 2?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2011 at 11:13 | comment | added | Jason Starr | In Artin's book on deformations of singularities, he also adds the name Schaps to the Hilbert-Burch theorem. | |
| Nov 4, 2011 at 9:36 | answer | added | Sándor Kovács | timeline score: 12 | |
| Nov 4, 2011 at 7:10 | comment | added | Angelo | Embedded deformations of a closed Cohen-Macaulay subscheme of codimension 2 in a regular affine scheme are unobstructed, by the Hilbert-Burch theorem. | |
| Nov 4, 2011 at 6:42 | history | edited | David Roberts♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Replaced CM by Cohen-Macaulay throughout, added tag
|
| Nov 4, 2011 at 6:41 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | CM usually means Complex Multiplication, but I think you mean Cohen-Macaulay so I'm editing to clarify. | |
| Nov 4, 2011 at 6:35 | history | asked | YOURS | CC BY-SA 3.0 |