Timeline for Is the category of rings co-well-powered?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2019 at 2:09 | history | edited | Sergei Akbarov | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 56 characters in body
|
| Nov 2, 2011 at 20:08 | vote | accept | Sergei Akbarov | ||
| Nov 1, 2011 at 19:23 | comment | added | Sergei Akbarov | I think I should apologize here also. The problem was that initially I wrote "locally small", and only later I edited the text. (Actually it was a surprise for me that the terminology in English is not the same than in Russian.) So explanation given by Anonymous was absolutely correct. | |
| Nov 1, 2011 at 18:57 | answer | added | Andrej Bauer | timeline score: 8 | |
| Nov 1, 2011 at 17:25 | comment | added | Sergei Akbarov | MacLane writes "co-well-powered"... | |
| Nov 1, 2011 at 16:43 | history | edited | Sergei Akbarov | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 177 characters in body; edited title
|
| Nov 1, 2011 at 16:34 | answer | added | Buschi Sergio | timeline score: 11 | |
| Nov 1, 2011 at 16:24 | comment | added | Guillaume Brunerie | Or well-copowered? | |
| Nov 1, 2011 at 16:19 | comment | added | Buschi Sergio | I think that the right word is cowellpowred | |
| Nov 1, 2011 at 15:47 | comment | added | Anonymous | This terminology also occurs and is probably more popular. In "CFWM" Maclane suggested not to use "locally small", because it may lead to confusion(as we saw here he predicted well). I was only trying to explain what Sergei Akbarov meant. | |
| Nov 1, 2011 at 14:29 | comment | added | Guillaume Brunerie | For me, if every object has a (small) set of subobjects, the category is called well-powered. | |
| Nov 1, 2011 at 13:51 | vote | accept | Sergei Akbarov | ||
| Nov 1, 2011 at 13:51 | |||||
| Nov 1, 2011 at 13:23 | comment | added | Anonymous | There are at least two different meaninigs of locally small category in mathematics. One is that a category has small hom-sets and other is that set of subobjects is small for all objects. His question is if ring has small set of quotient objects. | |
| Nov 1, 2011 at 12:57 | answer | added | Guillaume Brunerie | timeline score: 4 | |
| Nov 1, 2011 at 12:54 | history | asked | Sergei Akbarov | CC BY-SA 3.0 |