Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 26, 2013 at 20:15 vote accept janmarqz
Mar 16, 2013 at 16:11 vote accept janmarqz
Jun 26, 2013 at 20:15
Dec 17, 2009 at 19:56 history edited janmarqz CC BY-SA 2.5
Capitals, +tag
Dec 7, 2009 at 0:18 comment added janmarqz Sam, if N_3 would bound we should try to develop a similar theory of lenspaces where the the building block were solid N_3's with respective boundaries a pair of 2-torus with one point $\mathbb{R}$-blowups but, not now... anyway thanks a lot for your interest
Dec 7, 2009 at 0:11 vote accept janmarqz
Mar 16, 2013 at 16:11
Dec 7, 2009 at 0:11 vote accept janmarqz
Dec 7, 2009 at 0:11
Dec 6, 2009 at 16:15 answer added Allen Hatcher timeline score: 13
Dec 6, 2009 at 15:26 vote accept janmarqz
Dec 7, 2009 at 0:11
Dec 6, 2009 at 13:10 answer added Oscar Randal-Williams timeline score: 4
Dec 6, 2009 at 12:47 comment added Sam Nead The title of this question should be: "Does $N_3$ bound?". Then you could mention the application you have in mind (which I guess is gluing together copies of the bounded manifold?). Also, could you explain how lens spaces play a role in this question?
Dec 6, 2009 at 12:44 answer added Sam Nead timeline score: 7
Dec 6, 2009 at 6:23 comment added HJRW I don't understand this question. Are you asking whether there's a non-orientable handlebody bounded by N_3? If by N_3 you mean the non-orientable surface of Euler characteristic -2, the answer is yes. (Just take a solid Klein bottle and attach a 1-handle.) Please clarify.
Dec 6, 2009 at 5:41 history edited janmarqz CC BY-SA 2.5
edited title; edited title
Dec 6, 2009 at 5:31 history asked janmarqz CC BY-SA 2.5