Timeline for How do Brauer groups relate to zeta functions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Oct 31, 2011 at 6:16 | answer | added | B R | timeline score: 3 | |
| Oct 31, 2011 at 5:29 | answer | added | Alex B. | timeline score: 8 | |
| Oct 31, 2011 at 5:20 | comment | added | Daniel Litt | What you've written out is really only a tiny part of the cohomological approach to class field theory. The rest is described very well by Cassels-Frohlich. | |
| Oct 31, 2011 at 3:53 | comment | added | Makhalan Duff | I suppose I have two indications of a connection. The first is the fact that people call both approaches "class field theory". The second is that both generalize quadratic reciprocity (for the second approach, specialize to quaternion algebras of the form $(p,q)$ where $p$ and $q$ are prime). | |
| Oct 31, 2011 at 3:40 | comment | added | Joël | Is is not clear that people think of them as equivalent, IMHO. | |
| Oct 31, 2011 at 2:30 | history | asked | Makhalan Duff | CC BY-SA 3.0 |