Timeline for Zero-free regions for the Dedekind zeta-function
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2011 at 0:40 | vote | accept | kuoytfouy | ||
| Nov 2, 2011 at 0:40 | comment | added | kuoytfouy | Yes, I just need a region for a fixed field. | |
| Oct 30, 2011 at 14:50 | comment | added | Denis Chaperon de Lauzières | (Though I am thinking here of the dependency with respect to the field; there's no problem if it's really the t-aspect, and nothing else, which matters.) | |
| Oct 30, 2011 at 8:53 | comment | added | Denis Chaperon de Lauzières | Of course there is no such zero-free region in general, and you'll have to deal with possible Landau-Siegel zeros in general (e.g., for quadratic fields). | |
| Oct 30, 2011 at 8:32 | answer | added | Lior Silberman | timeline score: 4 | |
| Oct 29, 2011 at 23:14 | comment | added | Peter Humphries | Have you tried Iwaniec-Kowalski? Chapter 5, if I'm not mistaken. I'm not sure if the proofs are included, but it most certainly is a standard reference. | |
| Oct 29, 2011 at 21:52 | history | asked | kuoytfouy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |