Timeline for Flatness over non-reduced schemes : no geometric characterisation
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2011 at 11:51 | comment | added | Sándor Kovács | Yes, thank you. I wanted to use $B$ instead of $Y$ to show that it is different than in your question. Clearly I immediately forgot. It is corrected now. | |
| Oct 24, 2011 at 11:50 | history | edited | Sándor Kovács | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
typo
|
| Oct 24, 2011 at 11:09 | comment | added | Julien Puydt | I guess Y=B? I'm also surprised that this remark came twice, but they didn't give references : they're so generous about pointers everywhere else... | |
| Oct 23, 2011 at 17:19 | history | edited | Sándor Kovács | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1405 characters in body
|
| Oct 23, 2011 at 14:46 | comment | added | Julien Puydt | Indeed, a scheme isn't just a topological space ; but they chose to write "geometric" not "topologic"... that is why I'm expecting a more complex answer somehow :-/ | |
| Oct 23, 2011 at 14:05 | history | answered | Sándor Kovács | CC BY-SA 3.0 |