Skip to main content
18 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 14, 2009 at 21:36 answer added Duke Leto timeline score: 3
Dec 9, 2009 at 8:45 comment added Kim Morrison @fpqc. Rudeness is unacceptable. I've failed at this in the past, but I'll try to reform too. :-)
Dec 7, 2009 at 6:00 vote accept Jeremy
Dec 7, 2009 at 5:55 vote accept Jeremy
Dec 7, 2009 at 5:58
Dec 6, 2009 at 14:46 comment added Alicia Garcia-Raboso @fpqc: all these homework questions come from different people. If all of them were coming from the same person, then maybe rudeness would have some effect, even though I don't find it appropiate. I think there's a discussion to be had on tea.mathoverflow.net about this, since MO will keep growing and inevitably will me more visible on Google and other search engines, which will most probably attract more people looking to get there homework problems solved.
Dec 6, 2009 at 14:09 comment added Harry Gindi There is reason to be rude given the large influx of homework questions.
Dec 6, 2009 at 12:46 answer added Aaron Hoffman timeline score: 3
Dec 5, 2009 at 22:43 comment added Alicia Garcia-Raboso @fpqc: there is no need to be so rude. Also, MINUS 1 POWER1111111111111 = MINUS 1 ;)
Dec 5, 2009 at 21:44 comment added Harry Gindi We do the rare mathematical physics question here, but usually it's at a much higher level than this.
Dec 5, 2009 at 20:49 history edited Jeremy CC BY-SA 2.5
response to comments
Dec 5, 2009 at 20:42 comment added Charles Siegel fpqc: that's not really true. We do have mathematical physics questions here, and studying the differential equations of systems of pendulums should be fair game, so long as the question is phrased clearly and mathematically. Now, Jeremy seems to be asking about how to take a nonlinear system of ODEs and linearize it, probably hoping for an analogy to the single pendulum where you got from $x''+sin x=0$ to $x''+x=0$ for small amplitude approximation. I don't know if there's a way to do this, because I don't know this stuff at all, but if he clarified, it should be a perfectly good question.
Dec 5, 2009 at 20:15 comment added Harry Gindi There's not really anything interesting to talk about here, so MINUS 1 POWER1111111111111. If your question involves pendulums or mass, it probably doesn't belong here. We only like to talk about the purest math here, for the most part. I don't know if there's a physics overflow, or an applied math overflow, but maybe you could try a math help IRC channel, say #math on freenode or #math on efnet.
Dec 5, 2009 at 19:32 history edited Jeremy CC BY-SA 2.5
added 218 characters in body
Dec 5, 2009 at 19:26 history edited Jeremy CC BY-SA 2.5
added 344 characters in body
Dec 5, 2009 at 19:22 comment added Jeremy I am trying to get a feel for what analysis us used beyond the introduction I have had. The equations for the double pendulum were derived from the second derivative of the equations for position of each mass and the tension of the mass against the rods. So far the only understanding I have been able to get from it is using numerically generated phase planes and plots motion made in maple. My Original post is at mathoverflow.net/questions/7849/…
Dec 5, 2009 at 16:36 comment added Ben Webster Jeremy- Your last question was closed for being a homework problem. Writing another one that's so vague most people won't follow it won't help matters.
Dec 5, 2009 at 16:02 comment added Ben Weiss Hi Jeremy, not all of us had a chance to read your last post, could you provide more details here? Tell us the set up of the problem, and maybe even a sentence or two about how you got interested in it and what you've tried?
Dec 5, 2009 at 15:41 history asked Jeremy CC BY-SA 2.5