Timeline for Lower bounds for partial sums of multiplicative functions
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2011 at 23:26 | vote | accept | Kevin Smith | ||
| Oct 18, 2011 at 19:22 | answer | added | Greg Martin | timeline score: 5 | |
| Oct 18, 2011 at 18:06 | comment | added | Kevin Smith | Ok, thanks Stopple. You needn't be confused- those characters are counter-examples, so I should allow for $l=0$ too. I will edit my question appropriately as I am trying to get at additional hypotheses that give a non-zero value for $l$. | |
| Oct 18, 2011 at 17:16 | comment | added | Stopple | I'm sorry, but I'm confused. Why isn't any Dirichlet $L$-function attached to a character $\chi$ modulo $d$ a counterexample: $\sigma_c=0$, $\sigma_a=1$. | |
| Oct 18, 2011 at 16:57 | comment | added | Kevin Smith | @ Stopple. Yes- take logs on both sides of ... and divide by $log x$ to get the formula for the corresponding abscissi of convergence. Thanks. | |
| Oct 18, 2011 at 16:53 | history | edited | Kevin Smith | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 27 characters in body
|
| Oct 18, 2011 at 16:49 | comment | added | Stopple | Can you elaborate on your 'which is equivalent to saying that ... for all multiplicative functions $f$' equation above? | |
| Oct 18, 2011 at 16:37 | history | edited | Kevin Smith | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 11 characters in body; deleted 5 characters in body
|
| Oct 18, 2011 at 16:32 | history | asked | Kevin Smith | CC BY-SA 3.0 |