Timeline for "Coarse" Arctic Circle Theorem
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2011 at 23:37 | comment | added | john mangual | My point is both shapes necome squares rotat ed 45° but maybe height function in scaling limit goes from 0 to 1 in first case and stays at 0 in the second. So boundary conditions are different? So inside limit height depends on microscopic conditions on boundary | |
| Oct 18, 2011 at 15:55 | answer | added | Henry Cohn | timeline score: 16 | |
| Oct 18, 2011 at 15:01 | comment | added | Noam D. Elkies | There's certainly some "microscopic" dependence, because just removing one of the two central rows of the first picture produces a similar-looking shape with only one domino tiling! But this effect is accounted for by the "height function" of the boundary. | |
| Oct 18, 2011 at 14:35 | answer | added | Joseph O'Rourke | timeline score: 17 | |
| Oct 18, 2011 at 14:00 | history | asked | john mangual | CC BY-SA 3.0 |