Timeline for Supercuspidals : clarification
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2011 at 16:41 | comment | added | Marty | It seems a little odd to me to include the adjective "admissible" in the definition of "supercuspidal". I would just say a supercuspidal representation is a smooth representation with trivial Jacquet module for any parabolic. Eventually, you prove that every irreducible smooth representation is admissible, by using parabolic induction and proving the result for irreducible supercuspidals. | |
| Oct 13, 2011 at 0:49 | answer | added | Joël | timeline score: 6 | |
| Oct 13, 2011 at 0:38 | history | asked | isildur | CC BY-SA 3.0 |