Timeline for Can local duality for elliptic curves be proven with "big rings"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2012 at 19:49 | comment | added | Nicolas B. | @Chandan Singh Dalawat: Funny! Et ceux du Collège de France répondaient des "conneries", c'est ça? (sorry but this joke only works in French!). | |
| Oct 11, 2011 at 17:20 | comment | added | François Brunault | Thinking over it again, I'm not so sure of my comment above, because it's not so clear that the multiplication-by-$n$ map is surjective on $E(B_{dR})$ (is it ?) | |
| Oct 11, 2011 at 7:46 | comment | added | François Brunault | Using the Kummer exact sequence, it seems that $H^1(K,E(B_{dR}))$ (or at least the $n$-torsion part) is the same as $H^1(K,E(\overline{K}))$. | |
| Oct 11, 2011 at 2:43 | comment | added | Chandan Singh Dalawat | The tag "fontaine" is interesting. Long ago, when you asked a graduate student at Orsay what he was doing, the invariable answer was "des fontaineries". | |
| Oct 11, 2011 at 0:22 | history | edited | Rob Harron |
add nt.number-theory tag
|
|
| Oct 11, 2011 at 0:15 | answer | added | Rob Harron | timeline score: 5 | |
| Oct 10, 2011 at 19:17 | history | edited | Marty | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 33 characters in body
|
| Oct 10, 2011 at 19:05 | history | asked | Marty | CC BY-SA 3.0 |