Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 22, 2022 at 8:14 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://www.math.uga.edu/~pete with http://alpha.math.uga.edu/~pete
May 17, 2014 at 22:10 comment added Filippo Alberto Edoardo Great answer: one of the clearer and more concise description of Weil restriction I have ever found.
S May 17, 2014 at 21:26 history suggested MichalisN CC BY-SA 3.0
Corrected some wrong parentheses
May 17, 2014 at 21:18 review Suggested edits
S May 17, 2014 at 21:26
Jan 15, 2010 at 19:45 history edited Charles Siegel CC BY-SA 2.5
Texified, by request
Dec 6, 2009 at 17:06 comment added Pete L. Clark @buzzard: yes, sir. Sorry, sir. :)
Dec 6, 2009 at 16:52 comment added Kevin Buzzard You should be reading my answers more carefully Pete ;-) mathoverflow.net/questions/6979/what-is-etale-descent/6986#6986
Dec 6, 2009 at 16:31 history edited David E Speyer CC BY-SA 2.5
Fixed formatting problems in second paragraph from end
Dec 6, 2009 at 6:09 history edited Pete L. Clark CC BY-SA 2.5
fixed according to David Speyer's suggestion
Dec 6, 2009 at 6:07 comment added Pete L. Clark @David: you're right. In the back of my mind I was wondering about how the Weil restriction of an affine variety became quasi-affine. I'll change it.
Dec 6, 2009 at 3:39 comment added David E Speyer Pete: While this is generally a great answer, the restriction of scalars of (G_m)_C is not A^2_R - {0,0}. Rather, it is Spec R[x,y][ (x^2+y^2)^{-1} ]. These have the same real points, but they are not the same scheme!
Dec 4, 2009 at 20:44 vote accept user2292
Dec 4, 2009 at 8:44 history answered Pete L. Clark CC BY-SA 2.5