Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 21, 2022 at 0:35 history edited David Roberts CC BY-SA 4.0
fixed arxiv front-end link, gave title and author
May 12, 2020 at 13:31 comment added ABIM Do you happen to have a reference to this fact?
Oct 8, 2011 at 20:57 history edited Vitali Kapovitch CC BY-SA 3.0
added 4 characters in body
Oct 8, 2011 at 17:19 comment added Suvrit My approach was to use the Daleckii-Krein theorem to write the Frechet derivative $De_X(Y)$ as a Hadamard product of two matrices, and then bound every unitarily invariant norm appropriately. But you already updated your answer using the nice formula above, saving me the trouble of typing an anwer :-)
Oct 8, 2011 at 17:05 comment added Deane Yang This is a really nice answer. I'm very happy that you've joined MO.
Oct 8, 2011 at 16:54 history edited Vitali Kapovitch CC BY-SA 3.0
added 1 characters in body; added 2 characters in body
Oct 8, 2011 at 15:36 history edited Vitali Kapovitch CC BY-SA 3.0
added 877 characters in body; added 4 characters in body
Oct 8, 2011 at 1:02 vote accept John Jiang
Oct 8, 2011 at 1:02 comment added John Jiang Hi Prof. Kapovitch, Thank you for your detailed solution. I tried to prove the map is 1-Lipschitz using matrix exponentiation but I get terms of the form $X^n Y + X^{n-1}Y X + \ldots + Y X^n$ for $d \exp_X (Y)$, when $X$ and $Y$ do not commute, which I cannot bound easily. I am not sure why the local 1-Lipschitz argument is needed. But it must be since otherwise the same argument using Jacobi field could be pushed to noncompact Lie groups.
Oct 8, 2011 at 0:40 history edited Vitali Kapovitch CC BY-SA 3.0
added 17 characters in body
Oct 8, 2011 at 0:23 history edited Vitali Kapovitch CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 82 characters in body
Oct 7, 2011 at 14:55 history edited Vitali Kapovitch CC BY-SA 3.0
added 46 characters in body
Oct 7, 2011 at 14:47 history answered Vitali Kapovitch CC BY-SA 3.0