Skip to main content
added 129 characters in body
Source Link
Donu Arapura
  • 35.2k
  • 2
  • 94
  • 160

Take a look at section 1 of M. Saito, Arithmetic mixed sheaves, Inventiones 2001. Part of the data offor an object in his category $MHM(X/K)$ is a bifiltered $D$-module defined over $K$. So it seems your that your question has a positive answer. But as always with this stuff, I might be overlookingit is easy to overlook something. If it's really important to you, you should ask himSaito directly    (he's not on Mathoverflow Mathoverflow as far as I know). Alternatively, as Matthew Emerton has suggested, it may be simpler to work out the cases you need by hand.

Take a look at section 1 of M. Saito, Arithmetic mixed sheaves, Inventiones 2001. Part of the data of his category $MHM(X/K)$ is a bifiltered $D$-module defined over $K$. So it seems your question has a positive answer. But as always with this stuff, I might be overlooking something. If it's really important to you, you should ask him directly  (he's not on Mathoverflow as far as I know).

Take a look at section 1 of M. Saito, Arithmetic mixed sheaves, Inventiones 2001. Part of the data for an object in his category $MHM(X/K)$ is a bifiltered $D$-module defined over $K$. So it seems that your question has a positive answer. But as always with this stuff, it is easy to overlook something. If it's really important to you, you should ask Saito directly  (he's not on Mathoverflow as far as I know). Alternatively, as Matthew Emerton has suggested, it may be simpler to work out the cases you need by hand.

Source Link
Donu Arapura
  • 35.2k
  • 2
  • 94
  • 160

Take a look at section 1 of M. Saito, Arithmetic mixed sheaves, Inventiones 2001. Part of the data of his category $MHM(X/K)$ is a bifiltered $D$-module defined over $K$. So it seems your question has a positive answer. But as always with this stuff, I might be overlooking something. If it's really important to you, you should ask him directly (he's not on Mathoverflow as far as I know).