Timeline for In hyperbolic 3-orbifold with totally geodesic boundary case, is it true: rank(the fundamental group of boundary M)< or equal 2 rank(fundmental group of M)?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2011 at 21:20 | history | edited | Ian Agol | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 59 characters in body
|
| Oct 6, 2011 at 17:33 | comment | added | Igor Rivin | @Agol: perhaps remarking this would have been a more appropriate course of action. | |
| Oct 6, 2011 at 13:00 | comment | added | Lin Jianfeng | thanks very much! I also think that if the boundary has some orbifold point, it may be a little complicated. | |
| Oct 6, 2011 at 9:37 | comment | added | Igor Rivin | WHy did someone downvote this??? | |
| Oct 6, 2011 at 9:36 | comment | added | Igor Rivin | I was assuming that the boundary had no orbifold points, correct. | |
| Oct 6, 2011 at 0:34 | comment | added | Lin Jianfeng | Is it identity on the boundary?? I think if there are some singular points on the boundary, some torsion elements in the fundemantal group of orbifold will be quotiented? | |
| Oct 5, 2011 at 19:30 | history | answered | Igor Rivin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |