Timeline for Why is Riemann-Roch an Index Problem?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2010 at 15:22 | comment | added | Pete L. Clark | @Alfonz: it seems to me that you are not missing anything and that the formulas should contain $L^{-1}$ as you suggest. Let's wait 24 or hours or so to see if anyone feels differently, then I, Rebecca Bellovin, or some other high rep user can edit the answer accordingly. | |
| Nov 3, 2010 at 0:06 | comment | added | Alfonz | Hi, I don't understand why in the second term it is $\dim H^0(X,L\otimes \Lambda^{0,1})$ and not $L^{-1}$ with the rest being the same. I suspect this is due to something that I am not recognizing, and it is probably completely trivial, but I would appreciate if someone could enlighten me. | |
| Dec 4, 2009 at 7:53 | comment | added | Rebecca Bellovin | A lot is brushed under the rug, like carrying out all of these steps on more than a formal level. Also, things like metrics on line bundles are hidden in the definition of the adjoint and the defintion of c_1. | |
| Dec 4, 2009 at 5:32 | vote | accept | Csar Lozano Huerta | ||
| Dec 4, 2009 at 5:31 | comment | added | Csar Lozano Huerta | that was great! Thks! | |
| Dec 3, 2009 at 20:11 | history | answered | Rebecca Bellovin | CC BY-SA 2.5 |