Skip to main content
added 8 characters in body
Source Link
Charles Siegel
  • 16k
  • 8
  • 89
  • 134

Well, for 3, it'd be noneall of them (well, at most one of them is empty, by Big Picard). The zeta function is meromorphic, but not rational, and so has an essential singularity, at infinity.

Well, for 3, it'd be none of them (well, at most one of them, by Big Picard). The zeta function is meromorphic, but not rational, and so has an essential singularity, at infinity.

Well, for 3, it'd be all of them (well, at most one of them is empty, by Big Picard). The zeta function is meromorphic, but not rational, and so has an essential singularity, at infinity.

Source Link
Charles Siegel
  • 16k
  • 8
  • 89
  • 134

Well, for 3, it'd be none of them (well, at most one of them, by Big Picard). The zeta function is meromorphic, but not rational, and so has an essential singularity, at infinity.