Timeline for Effective detection of CM modular forms
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 18, 2011 at 20:45 | vote | accept | Rob Harron | ||
Sep 18, 2011 at 20:42 | comment | added | Rob Harron | Ah, yes, for some reason I got myself confused looking at the analytic conductors, but it's clear on the Galois side. Thanks! I'll just add that a proof of the standard bound you mention is available in Murty's paper Congrences between modular forms available at mast.queensu.ca/~murty/congr.dvi . | |
Sep 18, 2011 at 20:02 | comment | added | Kevin Buzzard | Re the discriminant and conductor: if $N$ is the level of $f$ and $f$ is new, then $N$ is the product of $|d|$ ($d$ the discriminant of $K$) and the norm of the conductor of the grossencharacter. This just comes from basic facts about conductors of representations (if I got them right!) | |
Sep 18, 2011 at 19:41 | history | answered | Kevin Buzzard | CC BY-SA 3.0 |