Skip to main content
MathOverflow

Return to Question

added 25 characters in body
Source Link
name
name
  • 1.3k
  • 9
  • 17

If $S$ is the Zariski-Riemann space of a noetherian subring $k$ of a field $K$, Zariski-Samuel prove that $S$ is quasi-compact. If $S'$ is the subspace of valuations that are discrete (i.e. that valuation group is isomorphic to $\mathbb{Z}^n$ with the lexicographical ordering), is $S'$ still quasi-compact?

Is $S'$ dense in $S$?

If $S$ is the Zariski-Riemann space of a noetherian subring $k$ of a field $K$, Zariski-Samuel prove that $S$ is quasi-compact. If $S'$ is the subspace of valuations that are discrete (i.e. that valuation group is isomorphic to $\mathbb{Z}^n$ with the lexicographical ordering), is $S'$ still quasi-compact?

If $S$ is the Zariski-Riemann space of a noetherian subring $k$ of a field $K$, Zariski-Samuel prove that $S$ is quasi-compact. If $S'$ is the subspace of valuations that are discrete (i.e. that valuation group is isomorphic to $\mathbb{Z}^n$ with the lexicographical ordering), is $S'$ still quasi-compact?

Is $S'$ dense in $S$?

Source Link
name
name
  • 1.3k
  • 9
  • 17

Is the subspace of DVR's of the Zariski-Riemann space still quasi-compact?

If $S$ is the Zariski-Riemann space of a noetherian subring $k$ of a field $K$, Zariski-Samuel prove that $S$ is quasi-compact. If $S'$ is the subspace of valuations that are discrete (i.e. that valuation group is isomorphic to $\mathbb{Z}^n$ with the lexicographical ordering), is $S'$ still quasi-compact?