Timeline for Real-valued measurable cardinals and strong ideals
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 22, 2011 at 2:13 | comment | added | Joel David Hamkins | Eran, the combined forcing is $\kappa$-c.c., since the first step is, and the second step is c.c.c. So one can use the original measure, which is $\kappa$-complete. | |
Dec 21, 2011 at 20:12 | comment | added | Eran | Corollary 13.7.17 in the handbook requires that I is k-complete. But is this necessarily the case ? (Foreman's definition doesn't require it and corollary 2.6 implies only countable completion.) | |
Dec 20, 2011 at 14:26 | comment | added | Joel David Hamkins | Eran, the precipitous ideal on $\kappa$ in $V[G]$ is preserved to $V[G][H]$, since the forcing to add $H$ is c.c.c., and as I mentioned, Kakuda proved that $\kappa$-c.c. forcing preserves the existence of a precipitous ideal on $\kappa$. (And this is how one can see that $V[G]$ has a precipitous ideal, generated from the dual ideal to the measure on $\kappa$ in $V$, since the $G$ forcing is $\kappa$-c.c.) The forcing to add $H$ is the forcing to add $\delta$-many Cohen reals, which is definitely not $\omega_2$-closed. | |
Dec 20, 2011 at 13:46 | comment | added | Eran | Why does Product Measure Forcing preserve the precipitousness of k? is it omega_2 closed? | |
Sep 17, 2011 at 4:26 | vote | accept | Monroe Eskew | ||
Sep 17, 2011 at 0:24 | history | edited | Joel David Hamkins | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 467 characters in body
|
Sep 17, 2011 at 0:19 | history | answered | Joel David Hamkins | CC BY-SA 3.0 |