Timeline for K-Theory as a special $\lambda$-ring
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Mar 10, 2013 at 21:35 | answer | added | Will Sawin | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 9, 2013 at 23:48 | comment | added | Will Sawin | Is a natural isomorphism on the level of vector space the same thing as an isomorphism in $Rep(GL_n)$? | |
| Sep 15, 2011 at 23:40 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | @Neil All I can think of is that tensor products might be 'wrong' without assumption (something like $A$-nuclearity, whatever that means). Or restrict to finitely generated topological $A$-module bundles etc. | |
| Sep 15, 2011 at 16:15 | comment | added | Neil Strickland | In your last paragraph, I don't think that the relevant Grothendieck group even has a natural ring structure without further assumptions. | |
| Sep 15, 2011 at 16:03 | history | asked | Martin Brandenburg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |