Timeline for relation between pull-back of Cartier divisors, invertible sheaves and global sections
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 12, 2011 at 11:23 | comment | added | Fei YE | By extension, I mean that each section $\mathcal{O}_X$ is the image of a section of $\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^n}$. In other words, a section of $\mathcal{O}_X$ is the restriction of a section of $\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^n}$ on $X$. | |
Sep 12, 2011 at 10:23 | comment | added | user565739 | @ Fei YE, could you explain why surjectivity implies that $D$ can be extended to a hyperplane in $\mathbb{P}^n$, this is just what I would like to know. | |
Sep 12, 2011 at 8:46 | comment | added | Fei YE | Did you think about using the short exact sequence $0\to I_X(1)\to \mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^n}(1)\to \mathcal{O}_X(1)\to 0$? Besides, the subjectivity $\Gamma(\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^n}(1))\to\Gamma( \mathcal{O}_X(1))$ tells us that $D$ can be extended to a hyperplane in $\mathbb{P}^n$. | |
Sep 11, 2011 at 21:56 | history | asked | user565739 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |