Timeline for exchangeable normal r.v.s
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2011 at 14:59 | history | edited | Michael Hardy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 604 characters in body; added 9 characters in body
|
| Sep 9, 2011 at 21:50 | answer | added | David Moews | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 8, 2011 at 1:36 | answer | added | R Hahn | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 7, 2011 at 22:11 | answer | added | Yuri Bakhtin | timeline score: 0 | |
| Sep 7, 2011 at 22:06 | comment | added | Michael Hardy | @R Hahn: It would be an infinite-dimensional cube. Probably the copula would be the only thing you need to specify. It would have to somehow make the limiting distribution be what you want it to be. Then the question is: can that be done? | |
| Sep 7, 2011 at 21:57 | history | edited | Michael Hardy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
minor edit---grammar
|
| Sep 7, 2011 at 20:11 | comment | added | R Hahn | Can't you build something like this using a copula approach? The construction would be to consider some non-uniform density on the $n$-cube and then take element-wise inverse-cdf transformations to get the $X_i$ observations, which gives the first bullent. As long as the density on the cube is symmetric it should satisfy your second bullet, right? | |
| Sep 7, 2011 at 19:55 | history | edited | Michael Hardy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 560 characters in body
|
| Sep 7, 2011 at 19:46 | comment | added | David M Kaplan | @Michael you can also do \\{ and \\} (I've found). The first backslash seems to be treated as an escape character before interpreting the TeX, so that \\ sends \ to the TeX interpreter, and \\{ sends \{ as desired. But I don't know why. | |
| Sep 7, 2011 at 19:38 | history | edited | Michael Hardy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
typo; added 2 characters in body
|
| Sep 7, 2011 at 19:35 | comment | added | Michael Hardy | I finally got it to work by using \lbrace and \rbrace. | |
| Sep 7, 2011 at 19:29 | history | edited | Michael Hardy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
yet another attempt
|
| Sep 7, 2011 at 19:29 | comment | added | Michael Hardy | .....and neither does \left\{ \right\}. | |
| Sep 7, 2011 at 19:28 | comment | added | Michael Hardy | This place really needs to upgrade its software to the sort of thing used on stackexchange. I had no idea that typing \{ and \} within TeX didn't work here. | |
| Sep 7, 2011 at 19:24 | history | asked | Michael Hardy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |