Timeline for Recovering a polyhedron from its tumble-density profile
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Apr 20, 2017 at 2:26 | history | suggested | Martin Sleziak |
removed deprecated (geometry) tag - see the tag info: http://mathoverflow.net/tags/geometry/info
|
|
| Apr 20, 2017 at 2:15 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Apr 20, 2017 at 2:26 | |||||
| Apr 19, 2017 at 10:44 | history | edited | Joseph O'Rourke | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Image links broken; now fixed.
|
| Sep 5, 2011 at 10:21 | vote | accept | Joseph O'Rourke | ||
| Sep 3, 2011 at 3:58 | comment | added | Joseph O'Rourke | @jc: Thanks, this concept is certainly new to me! Indeed the "rotational averaging" in powder diffraction is analogous to my blurring by spinning. | |
| Sep 3, 2011 at 3:18 | history | edited | Joseph O'Rourke | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| Sep 2, 2011 at 17:30 | comment | added | j.c. | I don't know enough about it to write an answer, but this reminds me a bit of "powder diffraction" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powder_diffraction (without the diffraction, somehow). | |
| Sep 2, 2011 at 14:03 | comment | added | Joseph O'Rourke | Of course, not only do the questions generalize to higher dimensions, they also generalize to smooth convex shapes and to nonconvex shapes. | |
| Sep 2, 2011 at 13:02 | answer | added | Gjergji Zaimi | timeline score: 4 | |
| Sep 2, 2011 at 13:01 | history | edited | Joseph O'Rourke | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 characters in body; added 34 characters in body
|
| Sep 2, 2011 at 12:27 | history | asked | Joseph O'Rourke | CC BY-SA 3.0 |