Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
S Mar 15, 2023 at 6:58 history suggested The Amplitwist CC BY-SA 4.0
fixed broken link to springerlink.com; added zbMATH review links in tooltips; added DOI of another paper; added link to darij's comment
Mar 15, 2023 at 5:03 review Suggested edits
S Mar 15, 2023 at 6:58
Sep 3, 2011 at 18:43 comment added Gerhard Paseman And here I was looking at p being 1+prime because I thought the light was better. Gerhard "Ask Me About Missing Keys" Paseman, 2011.09.03
Sep 3, 2011 at 8:03 vote accept Shir
Sep 2, 2011 at 11:04 history edited Gjergji Zaimi CC BY-SA 3.0
added 164 characters in body
Sep 2, 2011 at 7:09 comment added Gjergji Zaimi Great, I edited the answer to reflect that.
Sep 2, 2011 at 7:08 history edited Gjergji Zaimi CC BY-SA 3.0
added 341 characters in body
Sep 2, 2011 at 5:21 comment added Shir I agree with Douglas, why isn't your "simple argument" in fact showing that, as you wrote, B(n)=2 for infinitely many n?
Sep 2, 2011 at 5:11 vote accept Shir
Sep 2, 2011 at 5:18
Sep 2, 2011 at 0:11 comment added Douglas Zare Your "simple argument" that there are no nontrivial ways to assign the signs for $n=p-1$, $p$ prime, solves the question as stated, since it shows that there is no $N$ so that there are nontrivial solutions for $n\gt N$.
Sep 1, 2011 at 20:12 comment added Gjergji Zaimi When looking at the Cohen-Shpilka-Tal paper I mentioned above you will see that the relevant results in Buhrman and de Wolf hold for a slightly more general setting, and they emphasize the point that current lower bounds on the degree come from mod p considerations and no technique is known that distinguishes between a very small range and a comparably sized range.
Sep 1, 2011 at 19:29 comment added Shir Thanks. A useful reference is the survey of Buhrman and de Wolf on complexity measures of boolean functions, where current results and some proofs appear.
Sep 1, 2011 at 18:16 history answered Gjergji Zaimi CC BY-SA 3.0