Timeline for Examples where it's useful to know that a mathematical object belongs to some family of objects
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 15, 2011 at 18:15 | comment | added | darij grinberg | Phil: Your proof using differentiation is another perfect example of how a property of a single matrix $A$ is proven by considering a whole family (actually, the one-parameter family $tA$). | |
Sep 8, 2011 at 14:16 | comment | added | Dan Petersen | Proving the density observation is nearly trivial. It's easy to see that a sufficient condition for diagonalizability is to have $n$ distinct eigenvalues, so the non-diagonalizable matrices are contained in the closed subvariety of $M_n(\mathbb C)$ defined by the vanishing of the discriminant of the characteristic polynomial. And clearly the complement of a hypersurface is dense. | |
Sep 6, 2011 at 1:08 | comment | added | Phil Isett | I'm not sure it's easier to do over the complex numbers. The function det(e^{tA}) solves $\frac{df}{dt}= \mbox{tr }A f$ with $f(0)=1$. The solution to the latter equation is unique since $\frac{d}{dt}(f e^{−t \mbox{tr }A} )=0$. Or you can just use the product definition $\mbox{\det } e^A =\lim e^{n \log \det(1+A/n)}$ and again differentiate $\det$ at the identity to conclude. Isn't proving this density observation you've quoted is a little harder than just differentiating $\det$ at the identity? | |
Sep 1, 2011 at 13:10 | history | answered | Oscar Randal-Williams | CC BY-SA 3.0 |