Skip to main content
Removed \ which prevented expression from appearing
Source Link
Michael Albanese
  • 19.3k
  • 9
  • 87
  • 160

Yes! However, as Rita, Torsten and Ru pointed out, my first ideas were too simple-minded. Although this makes the remarks by them somewhat unreadable, let me give the corrected answer:

So, let $X$ be a complex Enriques surface and $\sigma$ an involution. Let us denote by $\tilde{X}\to X$ the associated K3-cover, and let $\tau$ be the associated involution, i.e., $X=\tilde{X}/\langle \tau\rangle$.

Now, the automorphism group of $X$ in terms of $\tilde{X}$ is $$ {\rm Aut}(X)={\rm Aut}(\tilde{X},\tau) := {} ( \psi\in{\rm Aut}(\tilde{X})| \psi\tau=\tau\psi ) / \langle\tau\rangle $$ (typesetting the usual brackets does not seem to work?!). In particular, $\sigma$ lifts to an automorphism $\tilde{\sigma}$ of $\tilde{X}$.

Clearly, we have $\tilde{\sigma}^2\in\langle\tau\rangle$. I claim that $\tilde{\sigma}^2=\{\rm id}$$\tilde{\sigma}^2={\rm id}$. For otherwise, we would have $\tilde{\sigma}^2=\tau$, and $\tilde{\sigma}$ would be an automorphism of order $4$. In this case, since $\tau$ acts freely on $\tilde{X}$, the same would be true for $\tilde{\sigma}$. However, a K3 surface cannot possess a fixed-point free automorphism of order $4$: the quotient $S$ of $X$ by this automorphism would satisfy $\chi({{\mathcal O}_S})=1/2$, which is absurd. Thus, $\tilde{\sigma}$ is an involution on $\tilde{X}$.

Being an involution, $\tilde{\sigma}$ acts as $\pm{\rm id}$ on the $1$-dimensional vectorspace $H^0(\omega_{\tilde{X}})$. Since $H^0(\omega_{\tilde{X}})^{\otimes2}\to H^0(\omega_{\tilde{X}}^{\otimes 2})$ is onto, we conclude that $\tilde{\sigma}$ acts trivially on global sections of $\omega_{\tilde{X}}^{\otimes2}$.

Now, $\tilde{\sigma}$ induces $\sigma$ on $X$, and global sections of $\omega_X^{\otimes2}$ pull back to global sections of $\omega_{\tilde{X}}^{\otimes2}$. Since $\tilde{\sigma}$ acts trivially on these, we conclude that $\sigma$ acts trivially on global sections of $\omega_X^{\otimes2}$.

It is less obvious, but still true, that automorphisms of order $3$ and $5$ also act trivially on global sections of $\omega_X^{\otimes2}$. Mukai and Ohashi exploit this in their recent analysis of automorphisms of Enriques surfaces.

Yes! However, as Rita, Torsten and Ru pointed out, my first ideas were too simple-minded. Although this makes the remarks by them somewhat unreadable, let me give the corrected answer:

So, let $X$ be a complex Enriques surface and $\sigma$ an involution. Let us denote by $\tilde{X}\to X$ the associated K3-cover, and let $\tau$ be the associated involution, i.e., $X=\tilde{X}/\langle \tau\rangle$.

Now, the automorphism group of $X$ in terms of $\tilde{X}$ is $$ {\rm Aut}(X)={\rm Aut}(\tilde{X},\tau) := {} ( \psi\in{\rm Aut}(\tilde{X})| \psi\tau=\tau\psi ) / \langle\tau\rangle $$ (typesetting the usual brackets does not seem to work?!). In particular, $\sigma$ lifts to an automorphism $\tilde{\sigma}$ of $\tilde{X}$.

Clearly, we have $\tilde{\sigma}^2\in\langle\tau\rangle$. I claim that $\tilde{\sigma}^2=\{\rm id}$. For otherwise, we would have $\tilde{\sigma}^2=\tau$, and $\tilde{\sigma}$ would be an automorphism of order $4$. In this case, since $\tau$ acts freely on $\tilde{X}$, the same would be true for $\tilde{\sigma}$. However, a K3 surface cannot possess a fixed-point free automorphism of order $4$: the quotient $S$ of $X$ by this automorphism would satisfy $\chi({{\mathcal O}_S})=1/2$, which is absurd. Thus, $\tilde{\sigma}$ is an involution on $\tilde{X}$.

Being an involution, $\tilde{\sigma}$ acts as $\pm{\rm id}$ on the $1$-dimensional vectorspace $H^0(\omega_{\tilde{X}})$. Since $H^0(\omega_{\tilde{X}})^{\otimes2}\to H^0(\omega_{\tilde{X}}^{\otimes 2})$ is onto, we conclude that $\tilde{\sigma}$ acts trivially on global sections of $\omega_{\tilde{X}}^{\otimes2}$.

Now, $\tilde{\sigma}$ induces $\sigma$ on $X$, and global sections of $\omega_X^{\otimes2}$ pull back to global sections of $\omega_{\tilde{X}}^{\otimes2}$. Since $\tilde{\sigma}$ acts trivially on these, we conclude that $\sigma$ acts trivially on global sections of $\omega_X^{\otimes2}$.

It is less obvious, but still true, that automorphisms of order $3$ and $5$ also act trivially on global sections of $\omega_X^{\otimes2}$. Mukai and Ohashi exploit this in their recent analysis of automorphisms of Enriques surfaces.

Yes! However, as Rita, Torsten and Ru pointed out, my first ideas were too simple-minded. Although this makes the remarks by them somewhat unreadable, let me give the corrected answer:

So, let $X$ be a complex Enriques surface and $\sigma$ an involution. Let us denote by $\tilde{X}\to X$ the associated K3-cover, and let $\tau$ be the associated involution, i.e., $X=\tilde{X}/\langle \tau\rangle$.

Now, the automorphism group of $X$ in terms of $\tilde{X}$ is $$ {\rm Aut}(X)={\rm Aut}(\tilde{X},\tau) := {} ( \psi\in{\rm Aut}(\tilde{X})| \psi\tau=\tau\psi ) / \langle\tau\rangle $$ (typesetting the usual brackets does not seem to work?!). In particular, $\sigma$ lifts to an automorphism $\tilde{\sigma}$ of $\tilde{X}$.

Clearly, we have $\tilde{\sigma}^2\in\langle\tau\rangle$. I claim that $\tilde{\sigma}^2={\rm id}$. For otherwise, we would have $\tilde{\sigma}^2=\tau$, and $\tilde{\sigma}$ would be an automorphism of order $4$. In this case, since $\tau$ acts freely on $\tilde{X}$, the same would be true for $\tilde{\sigma}$. However, a K3 surface cannot possess a fixed-point free automorphism of order $4$: the quotient $S$ of $X$ by this automorphism would satisfy $\chi({{\mathcal O}_S})=1/2$, which is absurd. Thus, $\tilde{\sigma}$ is an involution on $\tilde{X}$.

Being an involution, $\tilde{\sigma}$ acts as $\pm{\rm id}$ on the $1$-dimensional vectorspace $H^0(\omega_{\tilde{X}})$. Since $H^0(\omega_{\tilde{X}})^{\otimes2}\to H^0(\omega_{\tilde{X}}^{\otimes 2})$ is onto, we conclude that $\tilde{\sigma}$ acts trivially on global sections of $\omega_{\tilde{X}}^{\otimes2}$.

Now, $\tilde{\sigma}$ induces $\sigma$ on $X$, and global sections of $\omega_X^{\otimes2}$ pull back to global sections of $\omega_{\tilde{X}}^{\otimes2}$. Since $\tilde{\sigma}$ acts trivially on these, we conclude that $\sigma$ acts trivially on global sections of $\omega_X^{\otimes2}$.

It is less obvious, but still true, that automorphisms of order $3$ and $5$ also act trivially on global sections of $\omega_X^{\otimes2}$. Mukai and Ohashi exploit this in their recent analysis of automorphisms of Enriques surfaces.

completely rewritten answer
Source Link

Yes! However, as Rita, Torsten and Ru pointed out, my first ideas were too simple-minded. Although this makes the remarks by them somewhat unreadable, let me give the corrected answer:

Assume we are in characteristic $\neq2$. ThenSo, yourlet $X$ be a complex Enriques surface and $\sigma$ acts asan involution. Let us denote by $\pm{\rm id}$ on a local generator of$\tilde{X}\to X$ the associated K3-cover, and let $\omega_X$$\tau$ be the associated involution, i. Sincee., $X=\tilde{X}/\langle \tau\rangle$.

Now, the automorphism group of $X$ in terms of $\tilde{X}$ is an Enriques surface, we have $\omega_X^{\otimes2}\cong{\cal O}_X$$$ {\rm Aut}(X)={\rm Aut}(\tilde{X},\tau) := {} ( \psi\in{\rm Aut}(\tilde{X})| \psi\tau=\tau\psi ) / \langle\tau\rangle $$ (typesetting the usual brackets does not seem to work?!). In particular, $\sigma$ lifts to an automorphism $\tilde{\sigma}$ of $\tilde{X}$.

We may thus find local generatorsClearly, we have $m_\alpha$$\tilde{\sigma}^2\in\langle\tau\rangle$. I claim that $\tilde{\sigma}^2=\{\rm id}$. For otherwise, we would have $\tilde{\sigma}^2=\tau$, and $\tilde{\sigma}$ would be an automorphism of order $\omega_X$$4$. In this case, since $\tau$ acts freely on some open cover $U_\alpha$$\tilde{X}$, the same would be true for $\tilde{\sigma}$. However, a K3 surface cannot possess a fixed-point free automorphism of order $4$: the quotient $S$ of $X$ by this automorphism would satisfy $\chi({{\mathcal O}_S})=1/2$, swhich is absurd.th Thus, $\tilde{\sigma}$ is an involution on $\tilde{X}$. the

Being an involution, $m_\alpha^{\otimes2}$ glue to$\tilde{\sigma}$ acts as $\pm{\rm id}$ on the unique global section of $\omega_X^{\otimes 2}$$1$-dimensional vectorspace $H^0(\omega_{\tilde{X}})$. But thenSince $H^0(\omega_{\tilde{X}})^{\otimes2}\to H^0(\omega_{\tilde{X}}^{\otimes 2})$ is onto, we conclude that $\sigma$$\tilde{\sigma}$ acts trivially on this global sectionsections of (since it acts via multiplication by$\omega_{\tilde{X}}^{\otimes2}$.

Now, $\pm{\rm 1}$$\tilde{\sigma}$ induces $\sigma$ on $m_\alpha$), i.e.$X$, on alland global sections of $\omega_X^{\otimes2}$ (since the spacepull back to global sections of $\omega_{\tilde{X}}^{\otimes2}$. Since $\tilde{\sigma}$ acts trivially on these, we conclude that $\sigma$ acts trivially on global sections isof $1$-dimensional)$\omega_X^{\otimes2}$.

It is much less obvious, but still true, that automorphisms of order $3$ and $5$ also act trivially on global sections of $\omega_X^{\otimes2}$. Mukai and Ohashi exploit this in their recent analysis of automorphisms of Enriques surfaces.

Yes!

Assume we are in characteristic $\neq2$. Then, your $\sigma$ acts as $\pm{\rm id}$ on a local generator of $\omega_X$. Since $X$ is an Enriques surface, we have $\omega_X^{\otimes2}\cong{\cal O}_X$.

We may thus find local generators $m_\alpha$ of $\omega_X$ on some open cover $U_\alpha$ of $X$, s.th. the $m_\alpha^{\otimes2}$ glue to the unique global section of $\omega_X^{\otimes 2}$. But then, $\sigma$ acts trivially on this global section (since it acts via multiplication by $\pm{\rm 1}$ on $m_\alpha$), i.e., on all global sections of $\omega_X^{\otimes2}$ (since the space of global sections is $1$-dimensional).

It is much less obvious, but still true, that automorphisms of order $3$ and $5$ also act trivially on global sections of $\omega_X^{\otimes2}$. Mukai and Ohashi exploit this in their recent analysis of automorphisms of Enriques surfaces.

Yes! However, as Rita, Torsten and Ru pointed out, my first ideas were too simple-minded. Although this makes the remarks by them somewhat unreadable, let me give the corrected answer:

So, let $X$ be a complex Enriques surface and $\sigma$ an involution. Let us denote by $\tilde{X}\to X$ the associated K3-cover, and let $\tau$ be the associated involution, i.e., $X=\tilde{X}/\langle \tau\rangle$.

Now, the automorphism group of $X$ in terms of $\tilde{X}$ is $$ {\rm Aut}(X)={\rm Aut}(\tilde{X},\tau) := {} ( \psi\in{\rm Aut}(\tilde{X})| \psi\tau=\tau\psi ) / \langle\tau\rangle $$ (typesetting the usual brackets does not seem to work?!). In particular, $\sigma$ lifts to an automorphism $\tilde{\sigma}$ of $\tilde{X}$.

Clearly, we have $\tilde{\sigma}^2\in\langle\tau\rangle$. I claim that $\tilde{\sigma}^2=\{\rm id}$. For otherwise, we would have $\tilde{\sigma}^2=\tau$, and $\tilde{\sigma}$ would be an automorphism of order $4$. In this case, since $\tau$ acts freely on $\tilde{X}$, the same would be true for $\tilde{\sigma}$. However, a K3 surface cannot possess a fixed-point free automorphism of order $4$: the quotient $S$ of $X$ by this automorphism would satisfy $\chi({{\mathcal O}_S})=1/2$, which is absurd. Thus, $\tilde{\sigma}$ is an involution on $\tilde{X}$.

Being an involution, $\tilde{\sigma}$ acts as $\pm{\rm id}$ on the $1$-dimensional vectorspace $H^0(\omega_{\tilde{X}})$. Since $H^0(\omega_{\tilde{X}})^{\otimes2}\to H^0(\omega_{\tilde{X}}^{\otimes 2})$ is onto, we conclude that $\tilde{\sigma}$ acts trivially on global sections of $\omega_{\tilde{X}}^{\otimes2}$.

Now, $\tilde{\sigma}$ induces $\sigma$ on $X$, and global sections of $\omega_X^{\otimes2}$ pull back to global sections of $\omega_{\tilde{X}}^{\otimes2}$. Since $\tilde{\sigma}$ acts trivially on these, we conclude that $\sigma$ acts trivially on global sections of $\omega_X^{\otimes2}$.

It is less obvious, but still true, that automorphisms of order $3$ and $5$ also act trivially on global sections of $\omega_X^{\otimes2}$. Mukai and Ohashi exploit this in their recent analysis of automorphisms of Enriques surfaces.

added 56 characters in body
Source Link

Yes!

Assume we are in characteristic $\neq2$. Then, your $\sigma$ acts as $\pm{\rm id}$ on a local generator of $\omega_X$. Since $X$ is an Enriques surface, we have $\omega_X^{\otimes2}\cong{\cal O}_X$.

We may thus find local generators $m_\alpha$ of $\omega_X$ on some open cover $U_\alpha$ of $X$, s.th. the $m_\alpha^{\otimes2}$ glue to the unique global section of $\omega_X^{\otimes 2}$. But then, $\sigma$ acts trivially on this global section (since it acts via multiplication by $\pm{\rm 1}$ on $m_\alpha$), i.e., on all global sections of $\omega_X^{\otimes2}$ (since the space of global sections is $1$-dimensional).

It is much less obvious, but still true, that automorphisms of order $3$ and $5$ also act trivially on global sections of $\omega_X^{\otimes2}$. Mukai and Ohashi exploit this in their recent analysis of automorphisms of Enriques surfaces.

Yes!

Assume we are in characteristic $\neq2$. Then, your $\sigma$ acts as $\pm{\rm id}$ on a local generator of $\omega_X$. Since $X$ is an Enriques surface, we have $\omega_X^{\otimes2}\cong{\cal O}_X$.

We may thus find local generators $m_\alpha$ of $\omega_X$ on some open cover $U_\alpha$ of $X$, s.th. the $m_\alpha^{\otimes2}$ glue to the unique global section of $\omega_X^{\otimes 2}$. But then, $\sigma$ acts trivially on this global section (since it acts via multiplication by $\pm{\rm 1}$ on $m_\alpha$), i.e., on all global sections of $\omega_X^{\otimes2}$.

It is much less obvious, but still true, that automorphisms of order $3$ and $5$ also act trivially on global sections of $\omega_X^{\otimes2}$. Mukai and Ohashi exploit this in their recent analysis of automorphisms of Enriques surfaces.

Yes!

Assume we are in characteristic $\neq2$. Then, your $\sigma$ acts as $\pm{\rm id}$ on a local generator of $\omega_X$. Since $X$ is an Enriques surface, we have $\omega_X^{\otimes2}\cong{\cal O}_X$.

We may thus find local generators $m_\alpha$ of $\omega_X$ on some open cover $U_\alpha$ of $X$, s.th. the $m_\alpha^{\otimes2}$ glue to the unique global section of $\omega_X^{\otimes 2}$. But then, $\sigma$ acts trivially on this global section (since it acts via multiplication by $\pm{\rm 1}$ on $m_\alpha$), i.e., on all global sections of $\omega_X^{\otimes2}$ (since the space of global sections is $1$-dimensional).

It is much less obvious, but still true, that automorphisms of order $3$ and $5$ also act trivially on global sections of $\omega_X^{\otimes2}$. Mukai and Ohashi exploit this in their recent analysis of automorphisms of Enriques surfaces.

added 390 characters in body; added 4 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
Source Link
Loading