Timeline for The first complete proof of the Kronecker-Weber theorem
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2014 at 17:40 | comment | added | Rene Schipperus | I found this old answer, I dont know if you are still on overflow, but I have been reading Neumann's paper, he seems to state that 1)Weber's second proof is correct (but there is still this intersection issue) 2)That Weber had the "wrong" resolvents, so what are the "right" resolvents ? Why not take the intersection as the ground fields and build the resolvents over it ? | |
| Aug 31, 2011 at 7:19 | vote | accept | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez | ||
| Aug 31, 2011 at 2:02 | history | edited | Gerry Myerson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed typo
|
| Aug 30, 2011 at 20:04 | history | answered | Franz Lemmermeyer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |