Timeline for The first complete proof of the Kronecker-Weber theorem
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2011 at 7:19 | vote | accept | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez | ||
| Aug 31, 2011 at 0:45 | answer | added | anon | timeline score: 0 | |
| Aug 30, 2011 at 20:04 | answer | added | Franz Lemmermeyer | timeline score: 13 | |
| Aug 30, 2011 at 16:36 | answer | added | Francesco Polizzi | timeline score: 4 | |
| Aug 30, 2011 at 16:25 | comment | added | Denis Chaperon de Lauzières | See section 2 of emis.de/journals/SC/1998/3/pdf/smf_sem-cong_3_243-273.pdf for Schappacher's rather detailed historical survey. His conclusion is that the first complete proof is due to Hilbert. | |
| Aug 30, 2011 at 16:21 | comment | added | Gjergji Zaimi | Here is Hilbert's 1896 paper digizeitschriften.de/dms/img/… | |
| Aug 30, 2011 at 16:15 | comment | added | KConrad | You already mention that Hilbert is given recognition as having had the first proof (1896). Why not look into that some more? Washington's book on cyclotomic fields gives a proof in Chapter 14 and he refers the reader to a paper of O. Neumann from Crelle 323 (1981), 105--126 which might give some information about what exactly was in or not in the arguments of Kronecker and Weber. | |
| Aug 30, 2011 at 16:12 | comment | added | Damian Rössler | You should ask Norbert Schappacher (see www-irma.u-strasbg.fr/~schappa/NSch/Home.html ). | |
| Aug 30, 2011 at 15:59 | history | edited | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 6 characters in body
|
| Aug 30, 2011 at 15:49 | history | edited | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 11 characters in body
|
| Aug 30, 2011 at 15:44 | history | asked | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez | CC BY-SA 3.0 |