Timeline for What is meant by invariant measure on a graph?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2020 at 5:36 | history | edited | YCor |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 16, 2020 at 16:01 | history | edited | YCor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
updated link, added tags, removed unnecessary phrases
|
| Sep 3, 2019 at 11:48 | comment | added | Myshkin | where is the paper now? The link doesn't work anymore. Thanks | |
| Aug 30, 2011 at 3:32 | comment | added | Gjergji Zaimi | Well, for me the definitions in that presentation seem fine, so when you say you are having trouble understanding them, it sounds like it would be better if you were specific on which parts you are having trouble with. Is it understanding the weak topology on the set of graphs, the construction of Borel measures, what it means for a measure to be concentrated at a particular set, etc.? | |
| Aug 30, 2011 at 3:32 | answer | added | Daniel Mansfield | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 30, 2011 at 2:43 | comment | added | Raj | I thought I made it clear, but if there is something you do not understand, simply tell me and I will explain what I meant :) | |
| Aug 30, 2011 at 2:30 | comment | added | Gjergji Zaimi | The point is that they are not just interested in $S_{\infty}$ invariant Borel measures. They are interested in such measures that are concentrated in an isomorphism class of a particular relational structure. I wish you could make your question a bit more specific. | |
| Aug 30, 2011 at 1:32 | history | asked | Raj | CC BY-SA 3.0 |