Timeline for Are wild problems related to undecidable ones?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2014 at 13:59 | comment | added | Benjamin Steinberg | @AmritanshuPrasad, His proof uses the regular representation of an infinite group with undec word problem so fails. I give a proof on my blog which works by using the uniform word problem for finite semigroups. | |
| Sep 20, 2012 at 5:45 | comment | added | Amritanshu Prasad | @Benjamin: would Prest's proof fail for the theory of finite dimensional representations? In that case it does not really address the matrix pair problem, which is really about finite dimensional representations. | |
| Sep 17, 2012 at 15:06 | comment | added | Benjamin Steinberg | Note that all articles I could find in the literature show that the infinite dimensional representation theory is undecidable for wild quivers. I have a proof for the finite dimensional representation theory and will post one day on ArXiv. It is not difficult. | |
| Aug 31, 2011 at 15:58 | vote | accept | Amritanshu Prasad | ||
| Aug 29, 2011 at 6:42 | history | answered | Julian Kuelshammer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |