Timeline for Better terminology than "equivalence class of functions"
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2014 at 0:45 | comment | added | goblin GONE | "For ease of exposition, it is often good to supress those parameters that do not vary often." Agreed 100% | |
| Aug 26, 2011 at 21:08 | comment | added | Gerhard Paseman | Do what you think is best of course. In my opinion, you can still drop parameters briefly even if they are used often. E.g. 'For ease of reading, understand P is a shorthand: for the next section, P(...)=P_D(f,...) and Q(...)=P_C(g,...)'. It takes more care than skill to set up a shorthand for the reader to follow, as long as the shorthand is clear and consistent in its usage. Gerhard "Ask Me About Consistent Usage" Paseman, 2011.08.26 | |
| Aug 26, 2011 at 19:57 | comment | added | Tom LaGatta | Thanks, Gerhard. It's not apparent from the paragraph I showed you, but we actually need to change the parameter quite frequently. The central theorem of that section is that the conditional measure $P_D(f,\cdot)$ varies weakly continuously in both parameters $D$ and $f$. | |
| Aug 26, 2011 at 19:32 | history | answered | Gerhard Paseman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |