Skip to main content
changed cylinder -> cone; added 16 characters in body
Source Link
Victor
  • 1.9k
  • 10
  • 24

when mapping cylindercone is contractible

It is quite obvious that if a map is null homotopica homotopy equivalence, then its mapping cylindercone is contractible, but is the converse true: mapping cylindercone contractible => the map is null homotopica homotopy equivalence? I am thinking about both the topological category and the category of chain complexes.

mapping cylinder

It is quite obvious that if a map is null homotopic, then its mapping cylinder is contractible, but is the converse true: mapping cylinder contractible => the map is null homotopic? I am thinking about both the topological category and the category of chain complexes.

when mapping cone is contractible

It is quite obvious that if a map is a homotopy equivalence, then its mapping cone is contractible, but is the converse true: mapping cone contractible => the map is a homotopy equivalence? I am thinking about both the topological category and the category of chain complexes.

Source Link
Victor
  • 1.9k
  • 10
  • 24

mapping cylinder

It is quite obvious that if a map is null homotopic, then its mapping cylinder is contractible, but is the converse true: mapping cylinder contractible => the map is null homotopic? I am thinking about both the topological category and the category of chain complexes.