Skip to main content
MathOverflow

Return to Answer

added DOI link to Bergman's article; added title and authors of survey paper; added full citation in tooltip; HTTP -> HTTPS
Source Link
edit approved Feb 28, 2023 at 16:04
The Amplitwist
edit approved Feb 28, 2023 at 16:04
The Amplitwist
  • 1.4k
  • 3
  • 11
  • 22

In the non-commutative situation, it is called Groebner-Shirshov basis. See, for example, this the survey paper "Groebner-Shirshov Bases: Some New Results" by L. A. Bokut and Yuqun Chen, and references there. The case of universal enveloping algebra was considered by Bergman in G. M. Bergman, The diamond lemma for ring theoryThe diamond lemma for ring theory, Adv. in Math., 29, 178-218  (1978). I do not know about representation theory, but certainly this is one of the main tools of studying finitely presented rings and algebras over a field. The problem, of course, is that a finite Groebner-Shirshov basis (unlike Groebner basis in the commutative case) does not always exist.

In the non-commutative situation, it is called Groebner-Shirshov basis. See, for example, this survey paper and references there. The case of universal enveloping algebra was considered by Bergman in G. M. Bergman, The diamond lemma for ring theory, Adv. in Math., 29, 178-218(1978). I do not know about representation theory, but certainly this is one of the main tools of studying finitely presented rings and algebras over a field. The problem, of course, is that a finite Groebner-Shirshov basis (unlike Groebner basis in the commutative case) does not always exist.

In the non-commutative situation, it is called Groebner-Shirshov basis. See, for example, the survey paper "Groebner-Shirshov Bases: Some New Results" by L. A. Bokut and Yuqun Chen, and references there. The case of universal enveloping algebra was considered by Bergman in G. M. Bergman, The diamond lemma for ring theory, Adv. in Math., 29, 178-218  (1978). I do not know about representation theory, but certainly this is one of the main tools of studying finitely presented rings and algebras over a field. The problem, of course, is that a finite Groebner-Shirshov basis (unlike Groebner basis in the commutative case) does not always exist.

added 5 characters in body
Source Link
user6976
user6976

In the non-commutative situation, it is called Groebner-Shirshov basis. See, for example, this survey paper and references there. The case of universal enveloping algebra was considered by Bergman in G. M. Bergman, The diamond lemma for ring theory, Adv. in Math., 29, 178-218(1978). I do not know about representation theory, but certainly this is one of the main tools of studying finitely presented rings and algebras over a field. The problem, of course, is that thea finite Groebner-Shirshov basis (unlike Groebner basis in the commutative case) does not always exist.

In the non-commutative situation, it is called Groebner-Shirshov basis. See, for example, this survey paper and references there. The case of universal enveloping algebra was considered by Bergman in G. M. Bergman, The diamond lemma for ring theory, Adv. in Math., 29, 178-218(1978). I do not know about representation theory, but certainly this is one of the main tools of studying finitely presented rings and algebras over a field. The problem, of course, is that the Groebner-Shirshov basis (unlike Groebner basis in the commutative case) does not always exist.

In the non-commutative situation, it is called Groebner-Shirshov basis. See, for example, this survey paper and references there. The case of universal enveloping algebra was considered by Bergman in G. M. Bergman, The diamond lemma for ring theory, Adv. in Math., 29, 178-218(1978). I do not know about representation theory, but certainly this is one of the main tools of studying finitely presented rings and algebras over a field. The problem, of course, is that a finite Groebner-Shirshov basis (unlike Groebner basis in the commutative case) does not always exist.

Source Link
user6976
user6976

In the non-commutative situation, it is called Groebner-Shirshov basis. See, for example, this survey paper and references there. The case of universal enveloping algebra was considered by Bergman in G. M. Bergman, The diamond lemma for ring theory, Adv. in Math., 29, 178-218(1978). I do not know about representation theory, but certainly this is one of the main tools of studying finitely presented rings and algebras over a field. The problem, of course, is that the Groebner-Shirshov basis (unlike Groebner basis in the commutative case) does not always exist.