Timeline for Hyperbolicity on Riemann Surfaces
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2011 at 2:57 | vote | accept | ght | ||
| Aug 24, 2011 at 16:37 | comment | added | j.c. | In order to talk about hyperbolicity in Gromov's sense, you need to specify a specific metric structure on the Riemann surface, as they only come equipped with a conformal structure (pointed out in R W's answer). A natural choice is the Riemannian metric with canonical constant Gaussian curvature, but do you want to restrict to this case? I take it from some comments below that you don't, and would like to consider Riemann surfaces with some arbitrary choice of Riemannian metric conformally equivalent to this one. It might be worth editing something like this into your question. | |
| Aug 24, 2011 at 15:09 | answer | added | Alain Valette | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 20, 2011 at 1:15 | history | edited | ght | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
clarify a point
|
| Aug 20, 2011 at 1:00 | history | edited | ght | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
imprved the english
|
| Aug 19, 2011 at 21:22 | answer | added | Sam Nead | timeline score: 13 | |
| Aug 19, 2011 at 21:19 | comment | added | Sam Nead | "necessary condition to guarantee" makes no sense. Do you mean "sufficient condition"? Please edit the question. | |
| Aug 19, 2011 at 14:08 | answer | added | R W | timeline score: 8 | |
| Aug 19, 2011 at 13:45 | history | edited | ght | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added a related question
|
| Aug 19, 2011 at 13:08 | history | edited | ght | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed some typos
|
| Aug 19, 2011 at 12:43 | history | asked | ght | CC BY-SA 3.0 |