Timeline for Stable homotopy category and the moduli space of formal groups
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2011 at 15:54 | comment | added | Dylan Wilson | @Fernando: I was thinking about this... I know there are no Hopf maps in things like $D^{perf}(X)$ when $X$ is a scheme, but I wasn't sure if this still held for stacks | |
| Aug 19, 2011 at 15:52 | vote | accept | Dylan Wilson | ||
| Aug 19, 2011 at 15:52 | vote | accept | Dylan Wilson | ||
| Aug 19, 2011 at 15:52 | |||||
| Aug 19, 2011 at 13:05 | comment | added | Tyler Lawson | (You don't need to pick a field, the moduli of formal groups makes sense over any base.) | |
| Aug 19, 2011 at 12:51 | answer | added | Tyler Lawson | timeline score: 22 | |
| Aug 19, 2011 at 10:10 | answer | added | Jacob Lurie | timeline score: 24 | |
| Aug 19, 2011 at 9:31 | answer | added | Neil Strickland | timeline score: 24 | |
| Aug 19, 2011 at 9:16 | comment | added | Fernando Muro | The Hopf map is an obstruction for the existence of an algebraic model for the stable homotopy category | |
| Aug 19, 2011 at 8:18 | comment | added | Eric Peterson | Section 2.4.2 of Morava's Complex cobordism and algebraic topology says something about this and provides references for sub-questions. Here's an arXiv link: arxiv.org/abs/0707.3216 . | |
| Aug 19, 2011 at 7:13 | comment | added | Dylan Wilson | Uh oh... I'm realizing that this $M_{FG}$ doesn't make much sense unless I pick a field... should I rephrase the question by localizing the stable homotopy category at a prime and picking a field of characteristic $p$? Or am I being paranoid? | |
| Aug 19, 2011 at 7:09 | history | asked | Dylan Wilson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |