Timeline for The fundamental group of an algebraic surface
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2011 at 20:43 | history | deleted | J.C. Ottem | ||
| Aug 17, 2011 at 20:35 | comment | added | Henri | Maybe this is trivial, but I don't see why $L$ is ample and not only big. | |
| Aug 17, 2011 at 20:31 | comment | added | J.C. Ottem | Good point. Above I assumed that $\Sigma$ is the zero-set of a global section of $L$. | |
| Aug 17, 2011 at 20:04 | comment | added | Thom | Thank you. Can I apply Lefschetz hyperplane theorem if it is not known $L$ can be represented by a complex submanifold? All I know is my $\Sigma_k$ is a symplectic submanifold of $X$. | |
| Aug 17, 2011 at 19:44 | history | answered | J.C. Ottem | CC BY-SA 3.0 |