Timeline for On the finitess of algebraic De Rham cohomology of smooth quasi-projective variety
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2011 at 20:08 | vote | accept | Hugo Chapdelaine | ||
| Aug 10, 2011 at 20:35 | answer | added | Donu Arapura | timeline score: 7 | |
| Aug 10, 2011 at 19:28 | comment | added | David E Speyer | Exactly. I decided to write it out below. Without a normal crossing compactification, I really don't know how you would do this, even for $Y$ affine. So I wil be curious to see what answers people come up with. | |
| Aug 10, 2011 at 19:27 | answer | added | David E Speyer | timeline score: 12 | |
| Aug 10, 2011 at 19:09 | comment | added | Hugo Chapdelaine | Well, if you use Hironaka's desingularization theorem then I guess that you can express (using the Leray spectral sequence) the cohomology of $Y$ in terms of the cohomology of a compactification of $Y$ and of the normal crossing divisors. Is it what you have in mind ? | |
| Aug 10, 2011 at 19:05 | comment | added | David E Speyer | Am I allowed to use resolution of singularities? | |
| Aug 10, 2011 at 18:43 | history | asked | Hugo Chapdelaine | CC BY-SA 3.0 |