Timeline for Which is the correct ring of functions for a topological space?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2012 at 8:46 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | +1 for 'defestrates' from me as well, and also for 'joins option 4 in the flowerbed', which sounds not just like defenestration to me, but something Agatha Christie-like. | |
| Mar 9, 2010 at 1:16 | comment | added | Steven Gubkin | +1 for "defenestrates". You have consistently excellent mathematics and choice of verbs. | |
| Dec 2, 2009 at 20:13 | vote | accept | Theo Johnson-Freyd | ||
| Nov 30, 2009 at 19:11 | comment | added | Andrew Stacey | @Dave - not if you're a differential topologist! I use infinite dimensional LCTVS's as models for my infinite dimensional manifolds so I'm particularly interested in their rings of smooth functions. | |
| Nov 30, 2009 at 17:35 | comment | added | Dave Penneys | @Andrew - most of the non locally compact spaces that I deal with on a day to day basis are infinite dimensional topological vector spaces as you point out. But in this case, wouldn't the "correct" ring of functions be the continuous linear maps? What are some other examples? | |
| Nov 30, 2009 at 9:04 | history | answered | Andrew Stacey | CC BY-SA 2.5 |