Skip to main content
16 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 14, 2017 at 12:55 history edited GH from MO
edited tags
Aug 24, 2011 at 21:17 vote accept Raj
Aug 10, 2011 at 21:24 history edited Will Jagy CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 1 characters in body
Aug 10, 2011 at 13:16 history edited Charles CC BY-SA 3.0
clean up
Aug 10, 2011 at 13:14 comment added Charles See oeis.org/A03496 and oeis.org/A034962.
Aug 10, 2011 at 6:17 answer added joriki timeline score: 6
Aug 10, 2011 at 5:32 comment added Gerry Myerson I've taken the liberty of changing the title.
Aug 10, 2011 at 5:31 history edited Gerry Myerson CC BY-SA 3.0
Provided more informative title
Aug 10, 2011 at 4:21 answer added Álvaro Lozano-Robledo timeline score: 4
Aug 10, 2011 at 2:22 comment added GH from MO @Raj: Yes, the question is clear, see my response below.
Aug 10, 2011 at 2:17 comment added Raj ohhhh wow my bad, that was terrible wording... ughh well I think I'm still getting the main point of the question across
Aug 10, 2011 at 2:15 comment added GH from MO @Raj: Your $R_n$ is not recursively defined, but defined directly in terms of the primes. You have no recursion in your message.
Aug 10, 2011 at 2:13 comment added Raj Im sorry, I dont understand what you are asking, Michael. First I have a recursion that defines an infinite set of numbers (R_n=sum of three consecutive primes). Then I consider the number of prime numbers in the set {R_0,...,R_n}. That is R(n). I hope that clears up your question
Aug 10, 2011 at 2:13 answer added GH from MO timeline score: 9
Aug 10, 2011 at 1:52 comment added Michael Hardy Is it called "recursion" when the sequence you're defining and the one you're using to define it are two different sequences?
Aug 10, 2011 at 1:50 history asked Raj CC BY-SA 3.0