Timeline for Why are operads useful?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2023 at 16:34 | comment | added | Max Demirdilek | @ChrisHeunen A bit late to the party, but Charles Rezk's PhD thesis seems relevant. | |
| Aug 13, 2011 at 3:49 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | moved from User.Id=6976 by developer User.Id=69903 | |
| Aug 10, 2011 at 21:55 | comment | added | Steve | @Chris: try section 4.2 of "Koszul duality for Operads" by Ginzburg and Kapranov (arxiv.org/abs/0709.1228). The arXiv version doesn't seem to have any pictures though... | |
| Aug 10, 2011 at 15:31 | comment | added | Chris Heunen | @Steve: 1) sounds fascinating! I've never heard of operad cohomology. Could you give some references? | |
| Aug 9, 2011 at 18:24 | comment | added | user6976 | @Steve: Thank you! It is close to what I want, but perhaps not quite the same. Your 2) and 3) are still about where operads are used, not quite what makes them useful. Are they useful because the notion is so general that almost anything is an operad and then you can use the theory of operads to study these things (something like the notion of algebraic system in algebra)? | |
| Aug 9, 2011 at 18:09 | history | answered | Steve | CC BY-SA 3.0 |