Timeline for Is there a "Basic Number Theory" for elliptic curves?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 13, 2017 at 22:50 | history | edited | j.c. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fix link
|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
Aug 3, 2011 at 4:25 | history | edited | Chandan Singh Dalawat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
III --> Ш
|
Aug 3, 2011 at 3:00 | comment | added | Chandan Singh Dalawat | Mikhail Borovoi, I went to translate.google.com, translated Shafarevich from English to Russian, and copy-pasted the first letter. | |
Aug 2, 2011 at 16:02 | comment | added | Mikhail Borovoi | @Chandan Singh Dalawat: How did you type Cyrillic Sha in MO? | |
Aug 2, 2011 at 5:42 | comment | added | Chandan Singh Dalawat | Would be nice to insert the Cyrillic Ш instead of III. | |
Aug 2, 2011 at 2:52 | history | edited | Chandan Singh Dalawat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
divides --> does not divide
|
Aug 1, 2011 at 18:14 | comment | added | Franz Lemmermeyer | My definition of locally principal does not mean that the ideal is principal in the localization, which, as you're saying, is always the case. Essentially locally principal means that there is no "genus obstruction" to being principal. In the quadratic case of a field with discriminant $4m$, an ideal with norm $a$ is locally principal if $x^2 - my^2 = a$ has local solutions everywhere. | |
Aug 1, 2011 at 16:40 | comment | added | David E Speyer | Thanks very much! I'm confused by the notion of a locally principal ideal. In a Dedekind domain, isn't every (nonzero) ideal locally principal? | |
Aug 1, 2011 at 15:44 | history | answered | Franz Lemmermeyer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |