Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 30, 2011 at 18:25 comment added Dmitri Panov Sure, this is a nice article. There is a difference between non-Kahler and non-holomorphic cases (and your question was of course about non-holomorphic). The twistor construction, that I mentioned produces a huge amount on non-Kahler symplectic Calabi Yau six-manifolds -- for example because Kahler manifolds have quite restricted fundamental groups. But we don't know any non-trivial restrictions on complex manifolds...
Jul 30, 2011 at 18:18 comment added Thom Maybe they admit complex structure. not sure about that. Probably this seems very difficult question.
Jul 30, 2011 at 18:14 comment added Thom I was just checking the following papers on arxiv. They do contain some symplectic, but non Kahler Calabi-Yau 6 manifolds. Here are the links arxiv.org/pdf/1107.2623.pdf arxiv.org/abs/1105.3519
Jul 30, 2011 at 17:37 history edited Dmitri Panov CC BY-SA 3.0
added 50 characters in body
Jul 30, 2011 at 17:37 vote accept Thom
Jul 30, 2011 at 17:31 comment added Dmitri Panov No, there is no upper bound on the Betty number of symplectic Calabi-Yaus in dimension higher than $4$. On the other hand there is such a bound in dimension $4$, you can check it here: T. J. Li. Quaternionic vector bundles and Betti numbers of symplectic 4-manifolds with Kodaira dimension zero. Internat. Math. Res. Notices, (2006), 1–28.
Jul 30, 2011 at 17:27 history edited Dmitri Panov CC BY-SA 3.0
added 544 characters in body
Jul 30, 2011 at 17:16 comment added Thom Thanks! Do you know if there is an upper bound on the Betti numbers for symplectic Calabi-Yau?
Jul 30, 2011 at 17:14 history edited Dmitri Panov CC BY-SA 3.0
added 712 characters in body
Jul 30, 2011 at 17:03 history answered Dmitri Panov CC BY-SA 3.0