Timeline for Circumference of Convex Shapes
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2011 at 13:44 | history | edited | Noam D. Elkies | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Changed $\delta$ to $\partial$ for consistency; corrected transposition typo in "arbitrarily"
|
| Jul 28, 2011 at 20:08 | comment | added | Noam D. Elkies | [Of course I meant "the rubber band is limited to the complement of $s$", lower case, not "of $S$".] | |
| Jul 28, 2011 at 17:51 | vote | accept | Matthias Goergens | ||
| Jul 28, 2011 at 17:44 | vote | accept | Matthias Goergens | ||
| Jul 28, 2011 at 17:51 | |||||
| Jul 28, 2011 at 17:39 | comment | added | Matthias Goergens | Noam, yes, the intuitive argument is what motivated my generalisation. | |
| Jul 28, 2011 at 16:29 | comment | added | Noam D. Elkies | This also corresponds reasonably well with the following intuitive argument: Stretch a rubber band around $S$. Now remove $S$ but keep $s$ in the same plane, so the rubber band is limited to the complement of $S$. What happens? | |
| Jul 28, 2011 at 16:18 | history | answered | Noam D. Elkies | CC BY-SA 3.0 |