Timeline for How should I think about correspondences?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
2 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2009 at 17:39 | comment | added | Theo Johnson-Freyd | That's a better term, yes. I realized after posting that in the most interesting cases, e.g. Lagrangian Correspondences between symplectic manifolds, neither definition above is the correct one: a Lagrangian Correspondence between X and Y is a Lagrangian submanifold of X \times -Y, not a symplectic submanifold. | |
| Nov 29, 2009 at 7:53 | history | answered | Mike Shulman | CC BY-SA 2.5 |